<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TDF Pamela&#8217;s Top Ten of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/</link>
	<description>pop culture + geekery = happiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDF Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>TDF Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/?p=1365#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>The man candy was almost overwhelming in Wolverine.  And, as much as I hate to admit this, I am shallow enough that I can ignore the bad plot and the shoddy writing.  Just put Hugh Jackman in a wifebeater, and I&#039;m good to go. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man candy was almost overwhelming in Wolverine.  And, as much as I hate to admit this, I am shallow enough that I can ignore the bad plot and the shoddy writing.  Just put Hugh Jackman in a wifebeater, and I&#8217;m good to go. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2037</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/?p=1365#comment-2037</guid>
		<description>Oh yes.  I loved Wolverine for the eye candy.  Who didn&#039;t?  Hugh Jackman was worth the price of admission alone but you add in Ryan Reynolds and Taylor Kitsch and... PHWOAR!

Star Trek was awesome too.  I really wish I&#039;d been able to see it on the big screen.  

I&#039;ve written down all the books to check and see if my library has them.  They sound like stuff I might really enjoy!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes.  I loved Wolverine for the eye candy.  Who didn&#8217;t?  Hugh Jackman was worth the price of admission alone but you add in Ryan Reynolds and Taylor Kitsch and&#8230; PHWOAR!</p>
<p>Star Trek was awesome too.  I really wish I&#8217;d been able to see it on the big screen.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written down all the books to check and see if my library has them.  They sound like stuff I might really enjoy!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle M</title>
		<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/?p=1365#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>So happy to see that you included man-candy in your list because whoo-hee. There was lots going on in Wolverine. Also, I seriously need to see Avatar and Star Trek - both sound awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So happy to see that you included man-candy in your list because whoo-hee. There was lots going on in Wolverine. Also, I seriously need to see Avatar and Star Trek &#8211; both sound awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDF Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2034</link>
		<dc:creator>TDF Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/?p=1365#comment-2034</guid>
		<description>Finn, the guys were just too pretty not to mention here, haha.

Angie, thanks!  It was a good year for books and for SF movies. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finn, the guys were just too pretty not to mention here, haha.</p>
<p>Angie, thanks!  It was a good year for books and for SF movies. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/?p=1365#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>Great list, Pamela! I love your categories. STRANGELY BEAUTIFUL and SOULLESS were both a hoot. And I loved Star Trek so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list, Pamela! I love your categories. STRANGELY BEAUTIFUL and SOULLESS were both a hoot. And I loved Star Trek so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finn</title>
		<link>http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/2009/12/29/tdf-pamelas-top-ten-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>Finn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thediscriminatingfangirl.com/?p=1365#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>I think that &quot;shallow honorable mention&quot; is going on a lot of fangirl&#039;s list cause of the man-candy. :^D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that &#8220;shallow honorable mention&#8221; is going on a lot of fangirl&#8217;s list cause of the man-candy. :^D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
