Movie Review: Thor (2011)

September 16, 2011 Movies, Reviews, Watching 10

So I finally (finally) watched Thor last night. I was pretty excited for it, but now that I’ve finally seen it… I’m a bit disappointed. Allow me to explain in bullet points.

Beware spoilers!

I’ve tried to keep them to a minimum, but one of my favorite moments could be spoilery.

  • Visually, it was a gorgeous movie.
  • It was lovely and gaudy as shit. Asgard was like the gold-plated version of a 1950s futurist’s dream. I was wondering how they were going to create Bifrost and the whole rainbow bridge thing, because modern audiences are going to have a very specific vision of a rainbow bridge, and that’s going to look like something out of My Little Pony. I liked that they turned Bifrost into an Einstein-Rosen bridge, and the actual rainbow bridge that went out to the gate room was pretty gorgeous. I love that the rainbow effect was from iridescent minerals inside a glassy sort of stone. Good job!

    Branagh’s directing was very over the top, and I think it worked quite well with the material. I’m a big fan of his movies and was pretty surprised when it was announced that he was doing a superhero flick, but I think he handled it pretty well.

  • The acting was for the most part appropriately hammy.
  • Casting Anthony Hopkins as Odin was a stroke of brilliance, and for the most part, I liked all the casting. Thor’s band of merry men and woman were great, too, and holy cow is Tadanobu Asano hot. Jaimie Alexander was wonderful as Sif, and I want more warrior maiden, dammit. Also, Idris Elba was pretty inspired casting as Heimdall. I dig it.

    Chris Hemsworth was pretty much born to play Thor, though I kept getting distracted by the weird hairline on his wig and his dyed eyebrows. Also, the beard? Something was not right about that beard. But back to the acting: he was pretty good. I couldn’t stand him at first, which is exactly how the viewer should feel about that arrogant little princeling, and I bought into his remorse and redemption. It worked.

    I was wondering how Branagh would deal with the archaic language that’s used in the comics, and I definitely like that the modern-Earth people kept side-eyeing each other at Thor’s speech patterns. I have to admit, I was hoping that someone would say “By Odin’s Beard!” but I was doomed to disappointment.

  • What the heck was up with Natalie Portman?
  • Was it just me, or was she seriously phoning it in? My fellow discriminating fangirl Amanda thinks that she must have flown in on a weekend break from the other twenty movies she did this year to film her scenes, and I’m inclined to agree. I like Natalie Portman very much, but she wasn’t very good in this.

  • I wanted more from Loki.
  • Judging by the proliferation of Loki fangirls on Tumblr, I was expecting some serious awesomeness from that character. And… meh. Tom Hiddleston did a good job with the character, and yeah, he’s attractive, but this is Loki. God of mischief. I wanted him to fuck shit up because he felt like it, not because he wanted his daddy to love him as much as his brother.

    Loki’s one of those characters who really shouldn’t be a bad guy or a good guy. He switches sides when he feels like it, and he keeps balance in the world. The good guys of Asgard can’t get too powerful because Loki helps the Frost Giants or whoever fight against them. But the bad guys can’t get too powerful either because Loki will stab them in the back. We kind of saw some of that in Thor, but the whole emo kid motivation just didn’t do it for me. I wanted Loki’s ambiguity, not the desperate plea for fatherly attention that we got.

  • What was up with that romance?
  • The romance between Thor and Jane felt like it was crammed in at the last minute because someone said, “Wait! We can’t have a superhero movie without a love interest! Quick, make her kiss him!” I could totally buy into them being attracted to each other because hello! Chris Hemsworth with his shirt off! But the whole “I pine for you even though we just met two days ago and have hardly interacted!” thing that was going on at the end just didn’t do it for me.

  • Overall, the movie was entertaining but it just didn’t have a smooth flow to it.
  • It was kind of slow to start, despite the exciting celestial event in the first scene, and I just didn’t feel too much of a sense of urgency in the plot even though I know I was supposed to. It felt like it jumped from one Exciting Action Sequence to another Exciting Action Sequence with some kinda dull expository talking stuffed in between. It was fun to watch, don’t get me wrong. I just don’t see myself watching it over and over.

  • In closing, Chris Hemsworth really should spend the entire Avengers movie shirtless.
  • I’m just sayin’.

Buy It Now:

icon
icon

Favorite Moments: (in image form!)

Barnes & Noble
  • Bryce Perry

    It’s not that Natalie Portman was phoning it in, it’s just that Natalie Portman *isn’t that great an actress*. Yes, she’s had roles she was good in and it’s arguable that she was great in Black Swan (though I’ve not yet seen it to verify the reports for myself), but having a couple decent roles doesn’t mean you’re a good actor it means you had a couple decent roles. And I’m just not convinced that Nat is good.

    • / TDF Pamela

      You have a point.  I loved her in The Professional, but that was… dear god, seventeen years ago.  I’ve always kind of hung on as a fan, even after her atrocious performance in the Star Wars movies (I defended it with “But EVERYONE was wooden!”).  I haven’t seen Black Swan, either, and it looks melodramatic to me, but I still like her well enough.  Maybe if I start watching more of her movies, I’ll change my mind.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=692011670 Anonymous

    I concur about Hemsworth.  Too clothed.  I just think this isn’t the role for Natalie Portman.  It’s kind of like Queen Armadillo… it’s not that she’s a bad actress, because you can see the work she’s doing with her face and body, but she’s not good enough yet to spin gold out of a “less than” script.  She’s getting there, but it shows.

    • / TDF Pamela

      Excellent point about the lack of a good script.  I just couldn’t buy into her as an astrophysicist, too, which colored my perception of her performance.

  • Kerry F

    I could not stand Natalie Portman in this film, but I think that was less of her than the character. I found Jane rather embarrassing and not at all believable as this dedicated scientist… especially since as soon as she meets a dreamy man, becomes silly and somewhat juvenile. I’ve been meaning to watch this again (I saw it when it first came out) to get a better idea of it and also see what all the fangirls are talking about with Loki. I liked him in the film but oh man, not as much as I’m apparently supposed to.

    • / TDF Pamela

      I have to admit, I’d probably get a little silly if Hemsworth took his shirt off in front of me, but I just couldn’t buy into her as a serious astrophysicist, even one who’s supposed to believe all kinds of Mulder-ish stuff.

      I really wanted to like Loki a lot more than I did.  Based on the tumblr fangirling, I thought he was going to be the best villain ever.  Instead, he was just kinda whiny and nowhere near as chaotic as I was expecting him to be.  Sad fangirl!

  • http://twitter.com/eireannoir Teresa (Chrissy)

    I agree with Bryce. Natalie is just not as amazing as everyone makes her out to be. The only movie I can watch numerous times with her in it is ”Where the Heart Is.”

    “Black Swan” was good, but at the same time a lot of it felt like it was trying to hard, and the whole Mila/Natalie love scene felt out of place. Like someone was “Hey, these two are hot … how about we have them make out?” I’m all for gratuitous sex, but it still needs to make sense, ya know?

    The movie [Thor] definitely wasn’t ZOMG! But I got some awesome action, some gaudy yet gorgeous scenery (was definitely better than Olympus in “Clash of the Titans” — gawd, Liam’s bright-as-fuck armor…), hot bodies and most importantly Tom Hiddleston (emo or not … *dreams of a Loki and Magneto movie*).

    • / TDF Pamela

      Yeah, Thor was definitely fun to watch!  I think I went in with too-high expectations, particularly where Loki was concerned.  I’m hoping in The Avengers he’ll get a chance to really fuck stuff up, haha.

  • Anonymous

    I am with you on the expectations fostered by tumblr fangirling. To go even further, I’d seen so many emotastic Loki/Sif gifs and picspams show up out of the blue on my decidedly non-Thor tumblrs that I was expecting well, SOMETHING there. They share, what, two scenes? I also wanted Loki to be more mischief and less emo, but I can’t deny that Hiddleston has a certain magnetism – he kept me hooked.

    It was indeed a beautiful film, and over the top in all the right ways. I was thrilled as thrilled gets for a dose of surprise!Stellan Skarsgard, being all up on his Norse myths and legends. That man is adorable when he smiles/laughs. (That end scene really piqued my curious nodes as well!) And I have to also agree that this is the role Chris Hemsworth was built for. I actually had to go back and double check that it wasn’t his beanpole brother Liam in Star Trek because this guy serious beefed up. Only thing that weirded me out was the way he spoke – he was channelling Heath-Ledger-in-Ten-Things-I-Hate-About-You in a serious way. I couldn’t figure it out for a full day, just kept coming back to “it’s the WAY he speaks – not necessarily specifically an accent” and someone else named it for me.

    • “M”

      He apparently trained for 9 months with a Navy SEAL and put on 30 lbs of muscle, according to Ken Branagh’s director commentary.  I saw some Before & After pictures – a pretty startling difference.

      “he was channelling Heath-Ledger-in-Ten-Things-I-Hate-About-You in a serious way”

      Another Aussie doing the King’s English …?