TDF Pamela says 'Live Long and Prosper!'

FYI! The editor, TDF Pamela, is currently nomadic! In other words, she's in the process of moving cross-country, and therefore her address has changed and probably will change a couple more times in the next few months.

If you would like to send a review copy, please email her first to make sure you have the most up to date address.

Thanks!

Contact us!

TDF Staff

Editor/Head Writer:
TDF Pamela

Contributors:
The Bibliomaniac
Emily
Finn
Stacy B
Strangeness Abounds
Wenchie
WereGeek

To read more about us, head over and meet the geeks!

Follow us on Twitter!

Blog updates: @tdfangirlblog

TDF Pamela: @tdfangirl

Stacy B: @arysani

Tarte Amandine: @Tarte_Amandine

WereGeek: @weregeek

Bookmark TDF





Ten Things to Bring to San Diego Comic Con!

San Diego Comic Con is literally just around the corner! I’ll be there on Thursday and Friday, and I’m getting super excited.

Last year was my first time at SDCC, and so I thought I’d share some tips, particularly about things to bring, with those of you who are going for the first time this year or who just want to plan ahead for future geekery. ;)

1. Food & Drinks
Lunch! This would seem like the most obvious thing, but Thursday of last year, we didn’t think to pack a lunch and ended up having to shell out way too much money for a crappy slice of pizza. Pack sandwiches for lunch, snacks for whenever you’re taking a break, and drinks so you don’t have to pay $3 for a damn bottle of water.

2. A Backpack
This probably seems like another Duh entry, because you’re probably going to end up with fifteen enormous promo bags throughout the day. Well, if you’re like me (i.e. short), those bags literally hit the ground when they’re slung over your shoulder. I ended up folding them up and stuffing them, along with all of my other swag, into a handy dandy backpack. It’s also good for toting around the aforementioned food, heh.

3. Your Camera
Okay, the last Duh entry on this list is your camera. I mainly include this because I am absentminded and would probably forget mine if I didn’t put it on my own list o’ crap to pack. You will run into fifty kajillion awesome things at SDCC, and you will want to be able to prove to your friends that you saw Mark Hamill coming out of the men’s room. Oh, and keep your camera out at all times, because mine was in my bag and I didn’t get a damn picture of Mark Hamill coming out of the men’s room (well, that and it felt kind of rude to ambush the dude after he just took a pee).

4. Sunscreen & Seating
In Line Most of the con is indoors, yes, but if you don’t pick up your pass Wednesday night, you might end up standing in the mile-long line outdoors. If you’re a pasty geek like me, you’re gonna need the sunscreen. Trust me.

I’m probably going to bring along my floppy hat, too, because I got enough sun for the year while I was in Hawaii. And even if it looks cloudy/foggy, you can still get a sunburn, so slather on the SFP 50, fellow geeks. That line is long! We were in it for about two and a half hours last year. Lucky for me, the Fanfiancé’s parents (who helpfully live in North County) have little portable Ikea stools. They fit right into the backpack, and it’s nice to not have to park your butt on the pavement or the floor inside the convention center.

5. Art Carrying Case
If you’re planning on buying stuff like this from the fantastic people in Artist’s Alley:
Marvel Girl by Colleen Coover

you’re going to need one of these:

It’s kind of awkward to carry around, but trust me, a little awkwardness is better than bending your precious purchases. Amazon’s got a decent price for one, but if you’re in a hurry, check your local hobby or art supply store. You can also get cardboard poster tubes if you aren’t planning on buying anything that’s already matted.

6. Your Smartphone
If you don’t have an iPhone, feel free to ignore this entry. SDCC has an iPhone app available; at the moment it’s kind of sucky, but it will theoretically have the schedule of panels so you can use to map out your plan of attack. Your phone can also be your go-to device for tweeting or facebooking every nerdy squee of joy you experience during the day. Remember your charging cable, though!

7. Entertainment
There’s a lot of stuff to see at SDCC, but if you want to get into the more popular panels, be prepared to wait in line. If you’re like me and have the attention span of a gnat, you’re going to need something to entertain yourself with whilst sitting in those lines. I’m planning on lugging my iPad along, as there should be free wifi at the convention center, but I’m also bringing a book (like I said, attention span of a gnat). Be sure to bring power cables and chargers for whatever devices you bring.

8. Your Geekiest Duds
Whether you’re cosplaying or going in your civvies, SDCC is a great place to people watch. Do your part and add to the geek ambience. Pick our your most awesome nerdy shirt and wear it with pride. An added bonus is that you look even more awesome in pictures like this:

Yours truly with Mark Sheppard

;)

9. Business Cards
You’re likely to meet a lot of awesome people at Comic Con. You can always exchange info on napkins, but it’s kinda nifty to be able to hand them a card with your pertinent info. If the gods of printing smile upon me, I’ll have some spiffy The Discriminating Fangirl cards in my pocket.

10. Mascots
Bye bye, SDCC.Last year, I brought Lil’ Wolvie & Phoenix. This year… I’m going to have to go buy something, because all of my toys are packed up in Texas. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! I suppose I had a brain fart while packing for my summer nomadic trek. But yeah, I need to find a new toy to take along, because it makes for some really fun photos:

Hope this was a helpful list! If you’re going to SDCC or the Geek Girls Tweetup, keep an eye out for me!


TDF Pamela

The Discriminating Fangirl, who is more likely to answer to Pamela if you shout it at her, is the proud owner of an MA in English, focusing on children's/young adult literature and popular culture. Because of her ample free time thanks to being gainfully unemployed, she reads voraciously. She also loves geeky movies and tv shows, reads comic books as often as she can buy them, and when she's procrastinating, she enjoys playing video games. She can be contacted at t.d.fangirl @ gmail.com and followed on Twitter at the link below.

profile | twitter

X-Men: First Class... coming to the big screen?

If you’re an X-Men fan, you’ve probably already heard the rumors that an X-Men: First Class movie is in the works. The XM:FC comics are great; they feature the original X-Men team and their often funny adventures when things were just starting to roll at Xavier’s place. The XM:FC movie, on the other hand, would still be set within the universe created by Bryan Singer.

The current rumor is that Matthew Vaughn, director of Kick-Ass, has been offered the director’s seat and has apparently turned it down.

I’ll admit that I haven’t been watching news about this movie very closely. I’m still pissed about X-Men: The Last Stand, and I don’t have a lot of faith in Fox to not completely screw up this movie.

So why this post? Because I’d like to take a moment and plead with the powers that be to reboot the X-Men series. I know, I know, I’m as sick as you are of reboots, especially of series that came out ten years ago. Does Spiderman need to be rebooted? Nah. But hear me out.

See, one of the things I absolutely adore about the XM:FC comic book is the camaraderie between the original five X-Men. Scott’s the solid one, Warren’s the flighty one (pun intended), Hank is the smart one, Bobby is the smartass, and Jean is… Jean (i.e. awesome). They work together very well, and it’s a hell of a lot of fun to watch these five young people become close friends and a coherent team.

I want to see that on the big screen.

If Fox goes ahead and makes a First Class movie with the movieverse’s original team, we’d have Cyclops, Jean, Storm, Beast… As much as I like Storm in the comics (Halle Berry was terrible in the movies; sorry to her fans), there’s just not the same dynamic in that group as there would be in… well, any group with Iceman included.

So as much as I’m hesitant at the idea of rebooting every series that ever made money, I’d really like to see Marvel Studios start fresh with the X-Men.


TDF Pamela

The Discriminating Fangirl, who is more likely to answer to Pamela if you shout it at her, is the proud owner of an MA in English, focusing on children's/young adult literature and popular culture. Because of her ample free time thanks to being gainfully unemployed, she reads voraciously. She also loves geeky movies and tv shows, reads comic books as often as she can buy them, and when she's procrastinating, she enjoys playing video games. She can be contacted at t.d.fangirl @ gmail.com and followed on Twitter at the link below.

profile | twitter

Deconstructing Hollywood's Strong Female Character

My favorite ass-kicking lady, Ellen Ripley.

I know I’m responding to a ridiculously old post here, but I stumbled across it this morning and it got me thinking about Hollywood’s rather screwed up idea of strong female characters. mlawski over at Overthinking It posted a great rant about the “strong female characters” Hollywood is cramming down our throats, which is somewhat unfortunately titled “Why Strong Female Characters are Bad for Women.” Perhaps it would be better titled “Why ‘Strong Female Characters’ are Bad for Women,” because like mlawski, I’m of a mind that pretty much any female character created by Michael Bay does NOT fit the rubric of a strong woman, at least in my book. (Also, check out my fine MLA-approved use of quotation marks. This is what happens when I write blog posts when I should be doing homework.)

See, I’m a strong female character kind of reader/viewer/fan. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, I’m going to go for a book featuring a tough woman in the lead as opposed to one who faints and dithers and needs to be rescued. I’m not saying there’s anything particularly wrong with the passive characters, just that I don’t prefer them. When it comes down to it, I do think that we need a wide variety of female protagonist (as well as male protags), some weak, some strong, most falling somewhere in the middle of those two extremes. But my personal reading preferences tend toward the kick-ass heroines, and so I get frustrated, much like mlawski, when people start trumpeting characters like those in Bay’s Transformers movies as strong female characters.

It feels kind of disingenuous of me to start drawing a line in the sand and making Megan Fox stand on one side while Sigourney Weaver stands on the other, and this brings me to the crux of this issue. What do we do with strong female characters that are also sexy? Not saying that Ms. Weaver isn’t sexy (au contraire…), but Ripley, as an iconic tough movie woman, wasn’t created to capitalize on her attractiveness. What’s Her Face in Transformers was most certainly created to be masturbation material. Sure, she can work on cars, but she works on cars while bending over in very short shorts with her cleavage hanging out.

This is where I feel like I’m talking myself in circles. On one hand, I emphatically don’t like seeing women exploited for sex. On the other hand, I think that women should be able to express themselves sexually however they damn well please without being shamed for it. So… how do I reconcile my belief that women should be in control of their own sexuality with my complete and utter disgust at Megan Fox’s character (yes, I’m too lazy to look up the character’s name)? I think maybe it comes down to the feeling that the character actually is in control of her own sexuality. I know, I know, that’s incredibly subjective, and I suppose when it comes down to it, it’s up to each of us to make our own judgment call about what’s exploitative and what’s not. But how does that help send Hollywood the message that a sizeable chunk of their viewing audience is sick of wank-material sex kittens who can fix cars/hack computers/what have you being trumpeted as tough, role-model-worthy characters?

Last year at San Diego Comic Con, I attended the “Entertainment Weekly: Wonder Women: Female Power Icons in Pop Culture” panel, which was a round table discussion of strong female characters in Hollywood. Here’s SDCC’s description of the panel:

EW moderates a conversation with Sigourney Weaver (Avatar), Elizabeth Mitchell (Lost), and Zoe Saldana (Avatar) about the actresses who have redefined the rules, and the female characters that have shattered the glass ceiling for all women. Basically, a discussion with women who kick ass. (Addition: Eliza Dushku also sat on the panel)

While I agree that these women have all played characters who kick ass, I have to quibble with the idea that they’ve shattered the glass ceiling for all women. Having to be sexy sexy in order to be successful in Hollywood doesn’t exactly make it sound like that glass ceiling is coming down. Thankfully, Sigourney Weaver seemed to quibble with that, too, and she said something that really stuck with me. An audience member asked her if she feels like Hollywood is leading the way for strong women, and Ms. Weaver immediately shot down that idea. She basically said that we can’t expect Hollywood to blaze any trail, especially when it comes to feminism and the portrayal of women. Hollywood makes what they think will sell, and they tend to be way behind when it comes to social change. If we as audience members want to see change in Hollywood, we’ve got to make that change with our pocketbooks.

Hearing her say this made me want to stand up and cheer. We have to support movies that have strong female characters and not see the ones where we’re told that a strong woman is one who can save the world, but must do it while being supermodel-thin with big tits and a short skirt. The key there is the requirement that the woman must be traditionally sexy. Strong women most certainly can be sexy, but they can also go against the ideal of sexuality that our culture is so enamored with. They can be pretty or frumpy or nerdy, but they need to be realistic most of all. They need to have flaws to go along with their strengths.

This is different in books than in movies, mainly I think because books don’t have the same sort of visual representation of sexuality that movies do, but I do think that strong female protagonists in books need to have the same veneer of realism that I think movie heroines need. I don’t want to read about characters that are all tough or all weak; I want characters that find a balance between those two extremes, who can kick your ass, but who can also break down every once in a while.

One of my academic specialties is pop culture, particularly the portrayal of tough women in film and comic books. So, to make myself feel like less of a slacker for writing this instead of finishing up a midterm, I’m going to put my academic source hoarding to good use. Here is a list of my favorite books about the portrayal of strong female characters:

I’d love to hear your thoughts on the subject of strong female characters! This is something I’ve been chewing on for a while, and frankly, it’s a miracle that this post is somewhat coherent. Let me know what you think about the issue.

(As an aside, when I hit Google Images to find that pic of Ripley, the first two images to show up were of Ripley in her panties after waking up from hibernation. I think that makes my point for me.)


TDF Pamela

The Discriminating Fangirl, who is more likely to answer to Pamela if you shout it at her, is the proud owner of an MA in English, focusing on children's/young adult literature and popular culture. Because of her ample free time thanks to being gainfully unemployed, she reads voraciously. She also loves geeky movies and tv shows, reads comic books as often as she can buy them, and when she's procrastinating, she enjoys playing video games. She can be contacted at t.d.fangirl @ gmail.com and followed on Twitter at the link below.

profile | twitter

Reader Burnout Averted!

Yes, those are my ridiculously pale legs.

Most of the time, I’m a voracious reader. So it’s kind of disturbing when I look at my overflowing bookcases and can’t for the life of me find something to read. I think part of it is that I’m in my last semester of grad school and I’m kind of burnt out on that, but for the past few weeks, I just haven’t been able to read for pleasure. I’ve been reading for class, of course, but academic essays on cult films, while interesting, just aren’t the same as a really good book.

I started a few books (Child of Fire by Harry Connolly, which I am enjoying; and I’m also in the middle of a re-read of Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere, which I’m using for my not-a-thesis paper) but couldn’t keep up the reading. I read a few magazines, which is better than nothing, I suppose. I’ve been reading bits of Before the Fallout by Diana Preston, a history of the development of nuclear and atomic science from the discovery of radiation to the atomic bomb. Honestly, if I were better at math, I would seriously have gone into the sciences. I think they’re so fascinating. But I’ve mostly been reading that one before I fall asleep at night, and I haven’t been doing my usual sort of reading, where I zoom through a novel in a couple of days.

Thank goodness I managed to break that burnout cycle yesterday, when I plowed through Rachel Ward’s Numbers. Next Monday, The Discriminating Fangirl will be hosting a Numbers giveaway, and I wanted to be sure I had a review ready for you. I won’t say much about the book right now–look for the review on Monday, too!–but I can’t begin to tell you how good it felt to sit up in bed until midnight because I couldn’t stand to wait until morning to read the last few chapters.

I need to spend some time today working on my not-a-thesis paper, but I’m going to start Jennifer Estep’s Spider’s Bite this afternoon. Man, it feels good to read again.


TDF Pamela

The Discriminating Fangirl, who is more likely to answer to Pamela if you shout it at her, is the proud owner of an MA in English, focusing on children's/young adult literature and popular culture. Because of her ample free time thanks to being gainfully unemployed, she reads voraciously. She also loves geeky movies and tv shows, reads comic books as often as she can buy them, and when she's procrastinating, she enjoys playing video games. She can be contacted at t.d.fangirl @ gmail.com and followed on Twitter at the link below.

profile | twitter

TDF Pamela's Top Ten of 2009

Another year has flown by, and it’s nearly 2010. You know… when I was a kid, it seemed like it took forever for the year to pass, but now? I blink and it’s a new year. Sheesh. But since it is the end of the year, that means it’s time for top ten posts! Keep your eyes peeled for more lists from the TDF bloggers in the next few days!

And now, in no particular order…

TDF Pamela’s Top Ten of 2009!

Books

The Strangely Beautiful Tale of Miss Percy Parker by Leanna Renee Hieber

My reading preferences tend more toward urban fantasy instead of its close counterpart, paranormal romance, but I absolutely love it when I come across a fantastic PNR book. This book? Is definitely one of them. I was startled by my reaction to the heroine, Percy. You see, she’s rather meek and unassuming, and my preferred heroines tend to be tough ass-kickers. But Percy is so sweet and strong underneath her fragile exterior that I couldn’t help falling in love with her.

Speaking of which, I got completely swept up in the semi-unrequited love affair between Percy and the brooding hero, Alexi Rychman. Oh, Alexi. He pushes all of my tortured hero buttons; he’s dark, lonely, devoted to what he thinks is his life’s responsibility, and damn, do I love to see heroes like that crack in the face of love. [happy sigh] Add to that my mental casting of Richard Armitage as Alexi, and I spent most of this book in a swoon. The romance is delicious, the setting is creative and detailed, and it’s an incredibly fun read. I cannot wait for the sequel. Read my review here.

TDF Pamela’s Rating:

Soulless by Gail Carriger

This is another one of those books that treads the line between urban fantasy (urban… historical fantasy? historical paranormal steampunk urban fantasy? too… many… genres!) and paranormal romance, but however you categorize it, Soulless is a delightful read. Yes, I just said delightful. Carriger blends Austen-esque diction with supernatural and steampunk sensibilities, and the story is carried by the two wonderful protagonists, Alexia Tarabotti and Lord Maccon.

Alexia is a preternatural, someone who completely lacks a soul and can therefore negate the powers of a supernatural–someone with an excess of soul who has become a vampire or a werewolf. She is a spinster, partly because she has inherited her father’s Italian looks but mostly because she’s smart, quick-witted, and not afraid to show it. Lord Maccon, on the other hand, is a werewolf, the alpha of London’s pack, and he pushes my hero buttons, too. Let’s see… grumpy, intelligent, tempermental, passionate… And when these two butt heads, the sparks fly. Soulless is a funny, interesting, and smoldering read, and again, I can’t wait for the sequel. Read my review here.

TDF Pamela’s Rating:

Naamah’s Kiss by Jacqueline Carey

I had read the first two books in Carey’s Kushiel series years ago, but I lost track of the series after a while. I always meant to pick them back up, but just never did. Naamah’s Kiss takes place in the world of Terre d’Ange, but is set a few generations after the events of the Kushiel books, and in my opinion, it’s a fantastic place to start if you’d like to dip your feet into Carey’s richly imagined world. I love good worldbuilding, and Carey is definitely doing it right. Her world is based on a historical version of ours, but twists history and mythology just enough that the familiar is new and fascinating. I especially loved the part of the book set in Ch’in, and I hope Carey sets the next book there as well.

The book follows Moirin, a Maghuin Dhonn witch, as she grows and tries to follow her destiny as one blessed by Naamah. Her travels take her away from her homeland of Alba to her father’s land of Terre d’Ange, where she learns the pleasurable ways of Naamah, and to distant Ch’in. Moirin is a fascinating character who is torn between her two lines of heritage, trying to adhere to her familiar traditions but also drawn to the strange customs of Terre d’Ange and Ch’in. Naamah’s Kiss is a wonderful adventure story, and I’m looking forward to more books in this series. Read my review here.

TDF Pamela’s Rating:

Bitter Night by Diana Pharaoh Francis

Diana Pharaoh Francis’s first urban fantasy is a damn good one. Bitter Night is a tense, gripping story that kept me hanging until the last page. The protagonist, Max, is utterly believable, and she is also easy to sympathize with. She’s been bound to Giselle, a witch whom she thought was her best friend before Giselle used magic and pain to turn Max into her Shadowblade, a warrior who thrives in darkness and protects the coven. Max is comfortable in her hatred of Giselle and uses her anger as a shield to protect herself. Her anger has even blinded her to the fact that her Shadowblades and fellow Sunspears have become the family that she lost when she was bound.

When she runs afoul of another witch’s plot, Max finds herself saddled with another Shadowblade, Alexander, who is much older than her and comes from a very different background. It was fascinating to see these two try to break the other’s armor, and the characters bounced off of each other very well. The story itself is obviously the beginning of a series, and as such the end of this book doesn’t feel so much like an end as a “To Be Continued…” It’s a strong debut into the genre, and I’m betting this will be a great series as well. Read my review here.

TDF Pamela’s Rating:

Storm Born by Richelle Mead

Holy cow. I can’t believe I let this sit on my bookshelf for a couple of months. This is absolutely amazing! I absolutely adore the characters, and this book definitely tweaks my love of faery stories. Eugenie is a very well-developed, likable protagonist, and the supporting characters are not flat at all, but all have distinct personalities of their own. I freaking love that. The plot is fantastic. While deceptively simple on the surface (rescue a kidnapped teenage girl from the Otherworld), underneath it’s an intricately woven story threaded through with Mead’s signature humor. Much like with her Georgina Kincaid series, I found myself laughing throughout this book.

The sequel, Thorn Queen, isn’t quite as good as Storm Born, but this is definitely a series that I’ll be following. I love the romantic competition between Kiyo, Eugenie’s kitsune boyfriend, and Dorian, the Oak King, even though for me, it’s not much of a competition. Dorian all the way! He may have ulterior motives and be a sneaky bastard, but god, do I love him. And while I do have a problem with the use of rape in the series (no spoilers here!), the books are well-written enough that it doesn’t feel gratuitous in terms of the rape-as-impetus-for-character-development issue. Scroll down to my review here.

TDF Pamela’s Rating:

The Felix Castor series by Mike Carey

Carey writes a damn good book. The Felix Castor novels are modern hard-boiled detective stories with a supernatural twist and a healthy dose of black humor. The mysteries are twisty and complex without being overly convoluted; each time, I got to the climax and gasped aloud because I didn’t expect the truth, but damn, did it make sense! I loved being along for the ride as Felix struggles against time and the bad guys to figure out the mystery before whatever Very Bad Thing that might happen happens. I also loved Felix’s sense of dry, foul-mouthed, and self-deprecating humor, along with his amazing mental backlog of obscure pop culture references. My kind of guy.

The books are written in first person, as is traditional in detective novels, and Carey writes it very well. First person is always iffy with me; it usually takes a very talented author to write from a character’s head without sounding awkward. Carey also never lets any omniscient narration slip into Felix’s stream of consciousness, so the reader only knows what Felix has figured out after Felix decides to share it in his internal narration. Carey is very descriptive, and I really appreciate it. Sometimes too much description becomes boring in its exhaustiveness, but Carey’s vivid descriptions are always fascinating and paint a strong visual for the reader. The world itself is fascinating. It’s our world, set in our time, but sometime within the last twenty or thirty years, the dead began to wake up. Some come back as ghosts while others possess their own dead bodies ( as a zombie) or take over animal bodies (as aloup-garou). There are also nastier things surfacing: demons like Asmodeus, who possessed Felix’s friend Rafi a few years before the beginning of the series. I’m very much looking forward to what Carey has planned for the next books in the series, because the underlying issue of the dead rising is a driving factor in what Felix does. His own private version of exorcism is music; he plays tunes that “describe” the ghosts on his tin whistle. That is so unusual and so utterly cool. And his dealings with the dead in these books bring about some excellently written character development. Felix is slowly growing a conscience after spending years playing ghosts into the great whatever-comes-next. His cynical atheism provides a nice counterpoint to the traditional religious reasoning behind the dead rising, and it adds a nice level of uncertainty. Read my reviews of the three books in the series here.

Movies

Star Trek


I have a confession. I’ve been a Trek fan pretty much since birth. My parents both watched The Original Series all through my childhood, and I discovered The Next Generation when I was in junior high. I… I even had a Commander Riker t-shirt. Yes, I’m blushing right now. I watched Deep Space 9 and Voyager quite often–Voyager more so because when I lived in Germany for three years, we had thirteen channels and it was on a lot. My interest kind of waned after I moved back to the States, and I never could get into Enterprise, but I still loved the series in a nostalgic sort of way.

So when I heard that J.J. Abrams was planning on rebooting the original series, I was interested but trepidacious. Could it compare to the old series? Would it be hammy or cheesy? Would it run off in a completely wrong direction?

I am very pleased to report that I freaking loved Star Trek. The casting was brilliant, particularly in Zachary Quinto as Spock. Hell, I can’t narrow it down like that. Everyone was fantastic in their roles, and (I’ll probably get flamed for saying this) I even liked Chris Pine better than the Shat as Kirk. Shatner makes my skin crawl, what can I say?

The story is creative in the way it creates a divergence from the established timeline, and is a rousing adventure, even if it didn’t make much sense in some places. It was fun enough to watch, though, that I really didn’t care if the science was hilariously bad. I know, I know. Star Trek isn’t really about science, but red matter? Destroying a supernova with a black hole? My nitpicker got a bit edgy, but again, it was so much fun that I got over that really fast.

Also, you should definitely pick this one up on Blu-ray. It looks gorgeous in hi-def, and I’m not just talking about Quinto’s Sexy Spock. ;)

Avatar

I was skeptical of the Avatar hype, I have to admit. The trailer didn’t do a lot for me, other than provoke a couple of “ooooh” moments at the CG graphics. But I thought that’s all the movie would be: good CGI. The Fanboyfriend kept reassuring me that pretty much everything James Cameron has done has been gold, but I thought that all of Cameron’s hype that this movie would change moviemaking forever was hot air that would set him up for a fall.

I was so wrong.

The CGI is amazing and it does carry the movie. It is, without a doubt, the best I have EVER seen, and Avatar has definitely set the bar for future films. The Na’vi are completely realistic, and the environments… oh, the environments. I want to live on Pandora, it’s so beautiful. The bioluminescence was gorgeous, and I loved how Cameron incorporated it into the designs for the Na’vi as yet another way to show their connection to their planet. I wasn’t thrown out by CGI blunders once during the movie; nothing looked fake. It was amazing.

I saw the movie in IMAX 3D, and before this movie, I wasn’t a fan of 3D. Aside from Captain EO back when I was a kid, the only other movie I had seen in 3D before Avatar was the re-release of The Nightmare Before Christmas. It… wasn’t great. It felt gimmicky, as if it was in 3D only so they could lob pumpkins at the audience and make you duck. That 3D also made me kind of sick to my stomach, and I had to close my eyes every ten minutes or so to make the vertigo go away.

I was kind of afraid of Avatar in 3D, to be honest, but my fears were unwarranted. While it’s not completely immersive (unless it is completely redesigned, there will always be a problem with turning your head and having the 3D go all wonky), it’s as close to it as I could imagine. A friend of mine said that he kept feeling like he was going to inhale the little floaty embers, and that is so right. As long as I stared straight at the screen, I did feel like I was much more involved in the environment than I would have in 2D.

The plot is fairly standard: man goes into strange, alien culture, discovers that he sympathizes with them more than his own people, and fights to save alien culture. But this plot is standard because in the right hands, it works really well. Not only did I cry a few times, but I also came out of the theatre with the same feeling I got back when I was a kid and watched Medicine Man. I wanted to donate money to nature preservation charities, haha. The actors were good, particularly those playing the Na’vi characters, and damn, do I adore Sigorney Weaver. She’s just… amazing. The bad guys were over-the-top evil, the good guys were heroic and proud, and the whole thing was a fantastically good movie. I enjoyed every second of it, and I can’t wait to see it again.

TV

Farscape DVD Set

So this isn’t exactly something that’s new to 2009. In fact, the series started up ten years ago, but 2009 was the lucky year that A&E bought the DVD rights, and so we fans finally got our hands on an affordable full series set.

I was in Germany when Farscape first aired, and it didn’t show on any of the channels we got on our crappy military cable package, so I first saw it in reruns a few years ago. The first ep I saw was “Meltdown” from season 3, and that had to have been the best ep to suck me in. It was sexy. SEXY. So I started hunting down the out of print DVDs and amassed a small collection, but I had never been able to see the whole series. Imagine my joy when I found out that the entire series was being released on DVD. WOO! The Farscape panel at SDCC 09 got me even more excited, and I preordered that baby.

The series is fantastic. The CG is a bit crappy (but then this was ten years ago), but the makeup and puppetry make up for it, and the acting is great. It’s awesome to see the whole series and watch the ragtag crew of Moya slowly grow into a surrogate family. My favorite thing, though, has to be the relationship between John Crichton, the astronaut who got warped very far away from Earth in an experimental space flight, and Aeryn Sun, the Peacekeeper who discovers that there is so much more outside of the life she used to know. Not only are they both ridiculously sexy, their relationship is also wonderfully believable in its fits and starts.

So if you’re a Farscape fan and have some holiday money to blow, you should totally buy the complete series ASAP.

Video Games

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Click to drool in hi-res

So maybe this wasn’t the best game of 2009 by a long shot, but I didn’t play many new games this year, so nyah. ;) Those of you who’ve been reading TDF for a while know that I’m a serious Wolverine fangirl. I can’t help myself. I love the guy. But I always felt like he got declawed in the other video games. I mean, he’s Wolverine, for god’s sake. He routinely rips guys in half in the comics. But in games, we’re stuck with a Wolvie who just pokes and prods at the bad guys.

And then I played the demo for this game.

Holy crap. I had to run out and buy it immediately. See, this is Wolverine the way he’s supposed to be played. You get to slice bad guys’ arms off. If you hit them with the right combo move, you can even rip some of them in half.

OH YEAH.

Ahem. Every time I talk about this game, I feel kind of weird for feeling such glee about the violence. I mean, I just cheered about ripping a guy in half. That’s not usually my thing in games. But there’s something about X-Men Origins: Wolverine that turns me and my friends (who would sometimes sit around and watch while I played) into raving lunatics. It’s just plain fun. The storyline is ostensibly based on the movie, but in my opinion, the game’s storyline is much more interesting than what went into the movie. There’s a lot more background covered here, and while a lot of the story is running around, climbing walls, and eviscerating bad guys, it comes off as much more developed and thought out than the movie.

And if I might be shallow for a moment, the developers got videogame!Wolvie to look just like Hugh Jackman, and I have to say, I love it that Wolvie’s wifebeater gets ripped off as he fights. Of course, the shirt magically reappears when you level up, which cracked us up to no end, but until those level-ups, I get to drool over computer generated Hugh Jackman’s body. Heh.

And finally….

Shallow Honorable Mention
X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Click for full size lusting opportunity


I know, I know. This was not that good of a movie. But… but… I’m shallow. I admit it. And there was enough man candy in X-Men Origins: Wolverine to sate even the lustiest fangirl. This movie isn’t on my list because of its filmmaking merits. It’s here because the men are hot.

We got angsty, naked Wolverine. We got drawling, sexy Gambit. We got wisecracking, ripped Deadpool. We got dangerous, brooding Sabretooth. Hell, we even got Will.I.Am in a freaking cowboy hat. It was ALL sexy.

Well, except maybe for that kid who played teenage!Cyclops.


TDF Pamela

The Discriminating Fangirl, who is more likely to answer to Pamela if you shout it at her, is the proud owner of an MA in English, focusing on children's/young adult literature and popular culture. Because of her ample free time thanks to being gainfully unemployed, she reads voraciously. She also loves geeky movies and tv shows, reads comic books as often as she can buy them, and when she's procrastinating, she enjoys playing video games. She can be contacted at t.d.fangirl @ gmail.com and followed on Twitter at the link below.

profile | twitter